Plaintiffs Accuse Youtube of Negligence are casino licenses needed for bitcoin casino

Amendment Combines
All Lawsuits Into a Single Case

The complaint comprises. All parties in the lawsuit claim to have suffered after moving fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies to Bitconnect to invest in BCC tokens, as well as the Bitconnect Investment Programs.

According to attorney David Silver of law firm Silver Miller, which was named the”Class Counsel” of this situation, the consolidated complaint combines all of the lawsuits that have been filed against Bitconnect into one suitreviews casino review casino casino review – bitcoin Miller said that the merged lawsuit also names Bitconnect owners and promoters that weren’t previously targeted at the first complaints.

“As more information has become available, we have learned about more individuals involved in the rampant fraud connected with Bitconnect,” Silver explained and best bitcoin casino reddit. “The Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint highlights those actors who participated in the creation of Bitconnect and the promoters of Bitconnect. The quantity of fraud, and the total amount of investment loss in such a short time period is staggering. We hope to move the litigation along as quickly as possible and hold as many people accountable both in america and abroad.”

Plaintiffs Accuse Youtube of Negligence

The amended lawsuit claims the Bitconnect Lending Program and the Bitconnect Staking Program were “fraudulent Ponzi/pyramid schemes.” It also accuses the company of using”multilevel affiliate markets” to market its investment programs.

“Several of the promoter defendants had partnerships with Youtube pursuant to which the Bitconnect Defendants disseminated deceptive and harmful content to unsuspecting victims across the globe,” the law firm stated in the amended filing. “Youtube was negligent in failing to warn those victims of the harmful material, for which Youtube compensated their creators and publishers.”

In addition, the legal team claimed that the firm”cloaked” its promotional materials from”technological sophistication and jargon” to run a deceptively”simple” fraudulent operation. “Victims would invest in the Bitconnect Investment Programs after they had been driven to Bitconnect because of lucrative partnerships that the promoter defendants had with Youtube,” it stated. “Bitconnect would then pay present investors with new money from new investors, who were in turn expected and incentivized for more new investors to produce more new cash for Bitconnect.”

The plaintiffs seek to recover the funds all they claim to have lost. In a statement, Miller said this outcome would be”ideal.”

Do you agree that Youtube was negligent in compensating Bitconnect promoters and failing to warn prospective investors of their”harmful content?” Share your thoughts in the comments section below!

Images courtesy of Shutterstock

At there is a whole lot of free useful services. As an example, have you ever noticed our Tools page? You can lookup the exchange rate for a transaction in the past. Or figure out the value of your current holdings. Or create a paper wallet. And much more.


Вы можете оставить комментарий, или ссылку на Ваш сайт.

Оставить комментарий

Вы должны быть авторизованы, чтобы разместить комментарий.